This action will delete this post on this instance and on all federated instances, and it cannot be undone. Are you certain you want to delete this post?
This action will delete this post on this instance and on all federated instances, and it cannot be undone. Are you certain you want to delete this post?
This action will block this actor and hide all of their past and future posts. Are you certain you want to block this actor?
This action will block this object. Are you certain you want to block this object?
Are you sure you want to delete the OAuth client [Client Name]? This action cannot be undone and will revoke all access tokens for this client.
Are you sure you want to revoke the OAuth token [Token ID]? This action cannot be undone and will immediately revoke access for this token.
| Websites | https://jayvii.de |
|---|---|
| Introduction | https://social.jayvii.de/introduction |
| jayvii+social [AT] posteo [DOT] de | |
| Languages | DE / EN |

Leave it to Mozilla to go all in on AI right as everyone else is bracing for the AI bubble to pop

Mozilla has a new CEO who:
- Has been at Mozilla for less than a year
- Has no prior open source experience (but well in "fintech" and "real estate")
- Has a MBA (aka "brainworm diploma")
- Is all-in on AI
Thatâs exactly the kind of bingo profile the whole community has been waiting for.



Repeat after me: Separating username and password fields on separate (fucking responsive) page WILL NOT INCREASE A FUCKING SECURITY IN ANY WAY! IT WILL JUST MAKE THE PASSWORD MANAGERS TO WORK WORSE AND THUS IT WILL FUCKING DECREASE THE SECURITY!!!



I am not a talented person, Iâve never been called âgiftedâ or anything like that. Anything I can do, anything I achieved took a lot of work and stubbornness to achieve. Donât get me wrong. I am not saying that Iâm âselfmadeâ and that my position in society, my access to resources, etc. had nothing to do with it â quite the opposite. As a white heterosexual cis-man in Germany I have started live on easy mode. But I do not come from a wealthy background or one with large networks and access to power. I am not associated to any organization that gives me ârespectabilityâ or ârelevanceâ. Just a dude with a website who sometimes writes a few things that luckily people read and that got me some opportunities.
But those opportunities did take a long time to materialize. Like the first 5 to 10 years of me writing anything nobody gave a fuck. Which is probably good, there must be many dumb takes in there. But you learn and grow (hopefully) and today I have a modicum of visibility and a handful of people who read what I write and sometimes even pass it on to others. But it took 15 to 20 years to get there. It was a lot of work.
When we talk about âAIâ these days, we usually are not really talking about material systems and their actual properties. We talk about a vision, a narrative. About a hope maybe? The hope that we have machines now to get something from nothing.
In the beginning of 2025 Mikey Shulman (CEO of Suno, one of those websites where you can generate AI muzak) guested in a podcast and â maybe accidentally â framed the conversation on âAIâ perfectly in two terms. Shulman was talking about his service and how it was democratizing music and whatnot. Letâs look at a quote from the interview.:
âAnd so that is first and foremost giving everybody the joys of creating music and this is a huge departure from how it is now. Itâs not really enjoyable to make music nowâ
Did you see the two relevant words? Hereâs another quote:
âI think the majority of people donât enjoy the majority of the time they spend making music.â
Now you might think that this statement is a bit ⊠ridiculous. Most people make music for fun (because very few people can live off of it). They make it because they like it or because they just need to express something and music is their language. Music is a business â sure â but itâs also a Hobby (remember those: Things people do just cause they enjoy them without making money off of them?). But joy/fun is not the word I mean. Itâs the distinction of creating and making.
Shulman calls using his slop-machine creating (which brings joy) and what other people do making (which nobody likes). I find this distinction revealing but also in a way counterintuitive: Isnât it this big cultural norm to take pride in your work? That âhard workâ is something dignified? Is that not the whole foundation of the âfounderâ/âentrepreneurâ (I always feel like I need to take a shower after having typed that word) and how important they are narrative?
Creating in this understanding is exactly the idea to get something from nothing. Just think it and it exists. There is no process, no obstacle, no materiality, no challenge or struggle. Just the pure joy of creation. I wonât even get into the religious undertones of that distinction and how using âAIâ is framed as godlike even though that would probably be fruitful as well. In this reading the âjoyâ comes from having the artifact and all that comes from that (like being able to sell it, use it, present it to others in order to gain social recognition, etc.). The joy is maximum unbound productivity. Because thatâs what everything we do is for, right? Producing. Making a number go up. Creating means decoupling objects from the process of their making, decoupling them from the resources needed for them to be made, decoupling from the work that others needed to put into the systems enabling the creation. Itâs the whole âdo not let the real world, the other people in it tough meâ thing that defines so much of tech bro logic.
In contrast making is about the process. Sure, thereâs also something at the end, an artifact, something you might want to have. But the process itself is always part of it. Making is not just about having a thing itâs about the transformative experience of being in this world, interacting with its objects, properties, with other people in order to bring something into existence that means something to it. And every one of those processes leaves a mark on you. Something you learned, something youâll remember. That cool trick you found in doing something smarter. Or (as it often was and is in my case) a wound or scar of where you fucked up. Making is part of what allows you to become you, to be you. You are in the process, not just the object at the end and its potential use or sale.
And I think this distinction shows why âAIâ and capitalism are so deeply intertwined and why there probably is not really a leftist version of it: Capitalism wants to produce more and more with as little cost as possible to create growth and therefore value for those owning capital. âAIâ is that: Donât put anything in really and get something that might be passable to sell. You cannot get better than that really (from a capitalist viewpoint).
But even when thinking about how there is a leftist case to be made for automation (which I think there is) does that fit? Is the leftist case for automation âa lot of shitty productsâ? No â the point would be to produce the high quality goods people need in a way that is sustainable while still giving people more time to do things they enjoy. Like making music.
âAIâ claims that making things is for suckers. But a leftist case for automation only makes sense if it opens up time and space for people to spend their time on things they enjoy. To participate in processes that enhance their lives, their connections to others.
I think that the focus on creating is just the little capitalist devil sitting on our shoulders telling us to produce more.
I think the most radical act today is to just make something. Especially if you are not good at it or if itâs a bit of a struggle. Draw if youâre not good at it. Play the piano even though youâre not great. Make something just for the fun of being in this world, touching it, being in it. Becoming you. Let this radicalize you a bit.
Fuck creation. Love making.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

»Diese Open-Source-Projekte können Weihnachtsspenden gut gebrauchen:
Praktisch die gesamte IT-Infrastruktur wĂŒrde ohne #OpenSource zusammenbrechen. Doch das fragile Gleichgewicht aus Idealismus und kommerzieller UnterstĂŒtzung beginnt zu kippen, viele #Projekte sind unterfinanziert. Was dagegen helfen wĂŒrde â und was man selbst tun kann«
Jegliche Techkonzerne prahlen mit ihren Innovationen die schon ewig auf Kosten von Freiwillige aufbaute â das ist real #Kapitalismus.
đ§ https://t3n.de/news/diese-open-source-projekt-koennen-weihnachtsspenden-gut-gebrauchen-1721363/

Just cooked up a quick Mastodon theme for #ktistec :)Â https://src.jayvii.de/pub/ktistec-tweaks/file/css/mastodon.css.html

Oh. 2026 feiern wir 30 Jahre auf deutsche Tradition spucken. Seit 1996 ist die Vermögenssteuer, auch im Grundgesetz verankert, ausgesetzt. Der Grund fĂŒr den verfall des Landes, Spaltung und wirtschaften in die Taschen der CDU.
Also stellt den Selters kalt. 2026 wird ein JubeliÀumsjahr


