{
  "@context":[
    "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
    {"Hashtag":"as:Hashtag"}
  ],
  "published":"2025-01-02T13:14:24.700Z",
  "attributedTo":"https://social.jayvii.de/actors/jayvii",
  "replies":"https://social.jayvii.de/objects/FtKO6f8UbCA/replies",
  "to":["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public","https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted"],
  "cc":["https://social.jayvii.de/actors/jayvii/followers"],
  "content":"<p><a href=\"https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted\" class=\"mention\" rel=\"tag\">@toddsundsted</a> I noticed my ktistec instance being a lot slower since the last update, which reminded me of <a href=\"https://github.com/toddsundsted/ktistec/issues/96\">issue 96</a>, however the SQLite static version in the docker image is very recent and should not be effected of the bloom filter issue (SQLite3 version 3.45.3). Not really sure if this warrants an issue, but I do see a few REALLY slow queries in the logs slower than 18000.000ms. Did you notice something similar on a \"direct\" / non-docker install?</p>",
  "contentMap":{
    "en":"<p><a href=\"https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted\" class=\"mention\" rel=\"tag\">@toddsundsted</a> I noticed my ktistec instance being a lot slower since the last update, which reminded me of <a href=\"https://github.com/toddsundsted/ktistec/issues/96\">issue 96</a>, however the SQLite static version in the docker image is very recent and should not be effected of the bloom filter issue (SQLite3 version 3.45.3). Not really sure if this warrants an issue, but I do see a few REALLY slow queries in the logs slower than 18000.000ms. Did you notice something similar on a \"direct\" / non-docker install?</p>"
  },
  "mediaType":"text/html",
  "attachment":[],
  "tag":[
      {"type":"Mention","name":"@toddsundsted@epiktistes.com","href":"https://epiktistes.com/actors/toddsundsted"}
  ],
  "type":"Note",
  "id":"https://social.jayvii.de/objects/FtKO6f8UbCA"
}